[RuskiNet]

take a look about the full data, and then show a proof that the data is fake, you can lookup emails if you want.

Are you serious?
Please review the previous messages.

---

wc -l webdo.com_500k.csv 500000 webdo.com_500k.csv cut -d',' -f5 < webdo.com_500k.csv | awk -F'[@.]' '{print $(NF-1)"."$NF}' | sort | uniq -c 166517 gmail.com 166806 hotmail.com 166677 yahoo.com

Unbelievable, a database of 500,000 records but only emails in gmail.com, hotmail.com and yahoo.com   Really, this fake is very poorly done, it's too easy.

we didn't generated the data. we extracted the data and released it. anything else doesn't matter to us.

[jb75]

we didn't generated the data. we extracted the data and released it. anything else doesn't matter to us.

Did you dump a pre-production or test server with fake data?
The data is fake, there's no doubt about it, and you'd have to be a bit naive not to realize that. The only thing that can save you is if you dumped it on a test server that contained this fake data.

[ThinkingOne]

we didn't generated the data. we extracted the data and released it. anything else doesn't matter to us.

Adding to what @jb75 and others said...

The sample included cities of "Geraldinechester" and "West Tristinborough" and "Dickiborough", none of which exist in the real world.

And all the URLs in the sample are in the format http[s]://firstname.TLD.

[pine]

Hello. We have deemed that this database is fake.

Please do proper research when posting databases.

Inaccurate posts can lead to a ban if it happens constantly. Please be responsible and check before posting.

If you feel that this is incorrect please contact an Admin.